Coffee With Cato: II


Obama nominated his second Justice to the court.  I’m pretty sure that even he can’t screw this one up.  The Democrats still control 59 seats in the Senate so this is as close to a slam dunk as possible.

Ilya Shapiro at Cato echoed my thoughts on the issue:

Although all Democratic nominees would be expected to have similar views on hot-button “culture war” issues like abortion, gay rights and gun control…

…there is no indication that the solicitor general is anything but a standard modern liberal, with all the unfortunate views that entails on the scope of federal power.

There is no way that Obama was going to nominate someone who would’ve made Conservatives happy.  And, in many ways, is one of the valid consequences to elections.  The real question was not if the pick would be bad, rather, how bad would the pick be?

I get the feeling that Elena Kagan is not the worst selection for Conservatives.  She is not one of the hyper Leftists that are out there.  In fact, some on the Left are concerned over her policies that seem similar to Cheney and Dubya regarding Executive powers, especially during times of war.

It seems strange that she be nominated when she doesn’t have any experience as a judge, but that isn’t unprecedented; even recently.  In fact, to be a Supreme Court Justice you don’t even have to be a lawyer.

No, I think the pick is about as good as we could have hoped for.  She’ll be a junior member, almost certainly less influential than Stevens and potentially less Liberal.

Shapiro correctly points out that Obama has created a national interest in the mundane that is remarkable:

In an election year when a highly unpopular and patently unconstitutional health care “reform” was rammed through Congress using every procedural gimmick imaginable, voters are more sensitive to constitutional discourse now than they have been in decades.

From bailing out the financial and auto industries to fining every man, woman and child who doesn’t buy a government-approved health insurance policy — and, coming soon, regulating carbon emissions — the Obama administration is taking over civil society at a rate that alarms Americans and fuels both Tea Party populism and interest in libertarian policy solutions…

While I would rather the President make better decisions at the cost of dousing interest in libertarian policies, this is a distinct advantage; Obama continues to be put in positions that play into the hands of right thinking libertarians.  While I don’t think this debate will rage like health care and bailouts, it will be interesting none the less.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements
3 comments
  1. aldytop said:

    As a human being should cost a vehicle that has given hundreds of dollars and insurance. There are several companies offering different levels of satisfaction for customers. Some of the best auto insurance companies give guarantees for both operations and the devastating loss of a small vehicle

  2. pino said:

    Some of the best auto insurance companies give guarantees for both operations and the devastating loss of a small vehicle

    I agree. The best policy is to allow people to make their own decisions. What I object to is the government driving our decisions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: